Powell Network Blog

November 28, 2011

Somalia: Is Military Action the Answer?

Kenyan military personnel prepare to fuel a supplies helicopter at the Garrisa airstrip near the Somali-Kenya border October 18, 2011. Reuters

A few weeks ago, I wrote a short blog post at the Africa in Transition Blog of the Council on Foreign Relations about my thoughts on Kenya’s invasion of Somalia, and the possibility of defeating al-Shabaab and ending the Somali conflict. With the invasion approaching its 7th week, and Ethiopia wading into the fray, the Islamist group seems to have been cornered from all sides. But will this spell their doom?

Some Somali observers however think otherwise. Some suggested that the idea of defeating al-Shabaab through military means is not only simplistic, but also highly improbable, and gave a host of reasons why it will fail. Others looked at Somalia’s recent past, including the Ethiopian invasion of 2006 to justify fears as to why military action will never work, while others drew on the country’s complex sociopolitical dynamics as a reason why enforcing peace is impossible. Still, others raised doubts as to whether Kenya and the AU have the military capacity to sustain an invasion in Somalia for long.

Nevertheless, while many of these reservations are understandable, it should not dampen hopes of ending the Somali conflict— even if it means invading the country to save it, and preventing al-Shabaab from holding the entire region hostage. Whatever the motivations from previous interventions in Somalia, the problem is no longer confined to Somalia as in the past, and has become a case of “the lesser of two evils”. While doing something does carries risks, doing nothing puts the whole region at risk.

Why is Military Action Necessary?

The reasons necessitating military action are numerous—from stopping al-Shabaab infiltration into neighboring countries to its ties with al-Qaeda. Through the two decades of conflict in Somalia, hostilities were more or less confined within Somalia – until al-Shabaab raised the stakes by conducting raids into neighboring countries, and engaging in other terrorist activities that directly threaten the security and stability of its neighbors.

What are the Consequences of Failure?

The consequences of failure will be disastrous. It will mean periodic famine that will kill thousands and force millions across borders to equally impoverished countries. It will mean more al-Shabaab infiltrations in to neighboring countries, and more piracy in the high seas of the Indian Ocean. It will threaten international stability and provide a safe haven for al-Qaeda linked militants and their sympathizers. The list goes on and on.

Thoughts?

Mohamed Jallow is a former Colin Powell fellow (Class of 2008/2009). He is currently a program associate at the Council on Foreign Relations.

About these ads

Leave a Comment »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

The Rubric Theme Blog at WordPress.com.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 28 other followers

%d bloggers like this: